Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Education

Authors

  • Junaid Khan Department of Computer Application, G H Raisoni College of Engineering and Management, Jalgaon, India
  • Ritika Jaiswal Department of Computer Application, G H Raisoni College of Engineering and Management, Jalgaon, India

Keywords:

Generative artificial intelligence, education, ChatGPT, personalized learning, AI literacy, assessment, academic integrity, responsible AI

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has quickly become part of education through tools that can create text, explanations, code, images, feedback, and other learning resources. This paper studies how GenAI affects education by reviewing recent work on teaching, learning, assessment, academic integrity, accessibility, teacher practice, and institutional governance. A structured literature review was used to identify and group peer-reviewed studies and major policy guidance published during the emergence of contemporary GenAI, with more attention to higher education while also considering schools. The reviewed studies show that GenAI can support personalized learning, rapid formative feedback, brainstorming, language development, content generation, tutoring, and teacher productivity. Recent meta-analyses also report benefits for several university learning outcomes, but the results differ depending on learner, tool, task, intervention design, and context. However, hallucinated information, bias, privacy risks, unequal access, overreliance, reduced metacognitive effort, authorship ambiguity, and assessment disruption create important challenges. The paper presents a human-centred framework in which pedagogical purpose, AI literacy, verification, assessment redesign, equity, privacy, and institutional governance together shape the educational value. The paper concludes that GenAI should be treated neither as a replacement for teachers nor as a universally beneficial shortcut, but as an assistive technology whose value depends on responsible pedagogical integration and continued research and evaluation.

References

E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, p. 102274,

, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teachingand Learning. Boston, MA, USA: Center for Curriculum

Redesign, 2019.

T. Cotton, P. Cotton, and J. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.

D. Farrokhnia, S. Banihashem, O. Noroozi, and M. Wals, “A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 460–474, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846.

F. Miao and W. Holmes, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023.

O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators?” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 39, 2019,

doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.

B. Tlili et al., “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 15, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.

C.-K. Lo, “What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 410, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410.

M. I. Baig and E. Yadegaridehkordi, “ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 127, p. 102411, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411.

S. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Zhu, J. Wang, T. Tran, and Z. Du, “Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol 252, p. 124167, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167.

Published

2026-10-01