International Journal of Law, Human Rights and Constitutional Studies https://thejournalshouse.com/index.php/IntlJ-Law-Humanrights-Consstudy Advanced Research Publications en-US International Journal of Law, Human Rights and Constitutional Studies Deletion of Section 377 IPC in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Constitutional Alignment, Doctrinal Shifts, and Emerging Gaps https://thejournalshouse.com/index.php/IntlJ-Law-Humanrights-Consstudy/article/view/2306 <p style="margin-left: .25in;">The enactment of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, marks a significant transformation in India's criminal justice framework by replacing the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860. While the reform aims to modernise criminal law, the complete omission of Section 377 of the IPC has generated considerable legal and constitutional debate. Following the Supreme Court's decision in <em>Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India</em> (2018), Section 377 remained applicable to non-consensual sexual acts, offences involving minors, and bestiality, while consensual same-sex relations between adults were decriminalised. The absence of an equivalent provision in the BNS has created a legislative vacuum, particularly with respect to sexual offences against men, transgender persons, and non-binary individuals, who continue to remain outside the ambit of the gender-specific rape provisions. This article critically examines the legal implications of the repeal of Section 377, analyses the constitutional concerns arising under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, and evaluates the ongoing judicial scrutiny in <em>Gantavya Gulati v. Union of India</em>. It argues that the omission of Section 377 has weakened the statutory framework for addressing certain forms of sexual violence and has raised serious concerns regarding equality, dignity, and access to justice. The study concludes by emphasising the need for a gender-neutral legislative framework to ensure comprehensive protection against sexual offences and to eliminate the existing legal vacuum.</p> Nuzhat Khan Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Law, Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 2026-07-29 2026-07-29 4 2 (July-December) 1 4 Balancing Legal Principles and Human Relationships in Family and Adoption Law https://thejournalshouse.com/index.php/IntlJ-Law-Humanrights-Consstudy/article/view/2319 <p>Family and adoption law holds a distinctive position at the convergence of legal frameworks and interpersonal connections, necessitating that formal regulations address profoundly personal circumstances. This article looks at the basic ideas that guide family and adoption law, such as the child's best interests, parental rights, and the state's duty to protect welfare. It looks at the legal steps that must be taken to adopt a child, the rights and responsibilities of adoptive parents, and the protections that children have in different types of families.<br>The article also talks about the emotional, social, and moral factors that affect how people make legal decisions in this area. The conversation focuses on the significance of balancing strict legal frameworks with compassion and flexibility by looking at modern problems such changing conceptions of family, cross-border adoption, and the need for child-centered methods. In the end, the paper says that good family and adoption law must balance legal certainty with the real-life experiences of people to make sure that both justice and compassionate outcomes happen.<br><br></p> V Basil Hans Dr. Richard Pais Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Law, Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 2026-07-31 2026-07-31 4 2 (July-December) 5 12