Quantification of Size Segregated Particulate Matter Deposition in Human Airways
Abstract
Background: Air pollution has become a significant concern in both urban and rural sectors due to its
catastrophic effect on human health and the environment. Particulate matter (PM) is crucial among criteria
pollutants and is well correlated with human mortality and morbidity. Based on aerodynamic size, PM is
classified into coarse (PM10) and fine (PM2.5 and PM1). A recent study by World Health Organization showed
that PM has caused 7 million premature deaths globally. Also, the International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC) identified PM as carcinogenic as it is directly related to lung cancer. Human airway is the
primary pathway for PM to enter the human body. Hence the study on coarse and fine PM deposition in
the human respiratory tract is essential for health risk assessments.
Materials and Methods: Hourly measurements of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 are measured during a winter using
Grimm aerosol spectrometer near an arterial roadside in Chennai city of Tamil Nadu, India. PM deposition
in the human airway is investigated using the Multiple-Path Particle Deposition Model (MPPD) version 3.04.
In MPPD model, the stochastic structure which depicts the real human lung is considered. The deposition
in MPPD model is assessed for three size fractions, i.e. PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 under different breathing
scenarios viz. nasal, oral, and oronasal.
Results: Highest total deposited mass rate obtained from the MPPD model for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 are 942
ng min-1, 345 ng min-1, and 104 ng min-1, respectively. The maximum deposited mass rate is also assessed
in the head (PM10 = 904 ng min-1; PM2.5 = 244 ng min-1; PM1 = 57 ng min-1), tracheobronchial (PM10 = 284 ng
min-1; PM2.5 = 60 ng min-1; PM1 = 24 ng min-1) and pulmonary (PM10 = 32 ng min-1; PM2.5 = 89 ng min-1; PM1
= 27 ng min-1) regions. In the head region, maximum deposition is caused by nasal breathing; whereas,
tracheobronchial (TB) and pulmonary regions, the oral breathing leads to higher deposition. Results also
showed that for all PM sizes the lobe wise depositions are in the following order: right upper > left lower
> left upper > right middle > right lower. Further, the airway clearance results indicated that PM removal
is faster in the TB region than the alveolar region.
Conclusion: PM10 has a higher deposition in the head region whereas PM2.5 and PM1 deposition is higher in
the TB and pulmonary regions. This indicates that PM deposition inside lungs is influenced by its size and
several other deposition mechanisms viz. inertial impaction, sedimentation, diffusion and interception.
Further, this study results can be utilized for assessing health risks such as oxidative potential and toxicity
of deposited PM.
How to cite this article: Manojkumar N, Srimuruganandam B, Nagendra SMS. Quantification of Size Segregated Particulate Matter
Deposition in Human Airways. J Adv Res Alt Energ Env Eco 2018; 5(4): 15-22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.3093.201803
References
2. Bowe B, Xie Y, Li T et al. Associations of ambient coarse particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide with the risk of kidney disease: a cohort study. The Lancet 2017; 1: e267-76.
3. Brown J, Gordon T, Price O, et al. Thoracic and respirable particle definitions for human health risk assessment. Fibre Toxicol 2013; 10: 1-12.
4. Chen YC, Weng YH, Chiu YW et al. Short-term effects of coarse particulate matter on hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases: a case-crossover study in a tropical city. J Toxicol Environ Heal 2015; 78: 1241-53.
5. Cheng YS. Mechanisms of pharmaceutical aerosol deposition in the respiratory tract. AAPS Pharm SciTech 2014; 15: 630-40.
6. Cyrys J, Pitz M, Heinrich J et al. Spatial and temporal variation of particle number concentration in Augsburg, Germany. Sci Total Environ 2008; 401: 168-75.
7. Fernández Tena A, Casan Clarà P. Deposition of inhaled particles in lungs. Arch Bronconeumol 2012; 48: 240-6.
8. Franck U, Odeh S, Wiedensohler A et al. The effect of particle size on cardiovascular disorders - the smaller the worse. Sci Total Environ 2011; 409: 4217-21.
9. Füri P, Hofmann W, Jókay Á et al. Comparison of airway deposition distributions of particles in healthy and diseased workers in an Egyptian industrial site. Inhal Toxicol 2017; 29: 147-59.
10. Gupta SK, Elumalai SP. Size-segregated particulate matter and its association with respiratory deposition doses among outdoor exercisers in Dhanbad city, India. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2017; 2247: 1137-45.
11. Han Y, Ji Y, Kang S et al. Effects of particulate matter exposure during pregnancy on birth weight: A retrospective cohort study in Suzhou, China. Sci Total Environ 2018; 615: 369-74.
12. Happo M, Markkanen A, Markkanen P et al. Seasonal variation in the toxicological properties of sizesegregated indoor and outdoor air particulate matter. Toxicol Vitr 2013; 27: 1550-61.
13. Hillemann L, Zschoppe A, Caldow R et al. An ultrafine particle monitor for size-resolved number concentration measurements in atmospheric aerosols. J Aerosol Sci 2014; 68: 14-24.
14. Hofmann W. Modelling inhaled particle deposition in the human lung - a review. J Aerosol Sci 2011; 42: 693-724.
15. Islam MS, Saha SC, Sauret E et al. Pulmonary aerosol transport and deposition analysis in upper 17 generations of the human respiratory tract. J Aerosol Sci 2017; 108: 29-43.
16. Jørgensen JT, Johansen MS, Ravnskjaer L et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and incidence of brain tumours: The Danish Nurse Cohort. Neurotoxicology 2016; 55: 122-30.
17. Kim CS. Deposition of aerosol particles in human lungs: In vivo measurement and modelling. Biomarkers 2009; 14: 54-8.
18. Kim KH, Kabir E, Kabir S. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environ Int 2015; 74: 136-43.
19. Koullapis PG, Kassinos SC, Bivolarova MP et al. Particle deposition in a realistic geometry of the human conducting airways: Effects of inlet velocity profile, inhalation flowrate and electrostatic charge. J Biomech 2016; 49: 2201-12.
20. Kreyling WG, Semmler M, Möller W. Dosimetry and toxicology of ultrafine particles. J Aerosol Med 2004; 17: 140-52.
21. Kulshrestha A, Satsangi PG, Masih J et al. Metal concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 particles and seasonal variations in urban and rural environment of Agra, India. Sci Total Environ 2009; 407: 6196-204.
22. Lippmann M, Yeates D, Albert R. Deposition and clearance of inhaled particles. Br J Ind Med 1980; 37: 337-62.
23. Liu ZR, Hu B, Liu Q et al. Source apportionment of urban fine particle number concentration during summertime in Beijing. Atmos Environ 2014; 96: 359-69.
24. Martins V, Cruz Minguillón M, Moreno T et al. Deposition of aerosol particles from a subway microenvironment in the human respiratory tract. J Aerosol Sci 2015; 90: 103-13.
25. Morris RD. Airborne particulates and hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease: a quantitative review of the evidence. Environ Health Perspect 2001; 109: 495-500.
26. Police S, Sahu SK, Pandit GG. Chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter and their source apportionment at an emerging industrial coastal city, Visakhapatnam, India. Atmos Pollut Res 2016; 7: 725-33.
27. Salma I, Balásházy I, Hofmann W et al. Effect of physical exertion on the deposition of urban aerosols in the human respiratory system. J Aerosol Sci 2002; 33: 983-97.
28. Santibáñez-Andrade M, Quezada-Maldonado EM, Osornio-Vargas Á et al. Air pollution and genomic instability: The role of particulate matter in lung carcinogenesis. Environ Pollut 2017; 229: 412-22.
29. Sava F, Carlsten C. Respiratory health effects of ambient air pollution: an update. Clin Chest Med 2012; 33: 759-69.
30. Shi Y, Matsunaga T, Yamaguchi Y et al. Long-term trends and spatial patterns of satellite-retrieved PM2.5 concentrations in South and Southeast Asia from 1999 to 2014. Sci Total Environ 2018; 615: 177-86.
31. Smolik J, Zdimal V, Schwarz J et al. Size resolved mass concentration and elemental composition of atmospheric aerosols over the Eastern Mediterranean area. Atmos Chem Phys 2003; 3: 2207-16.
32. Song X, Yang S, Shao L et al. PM 10 mass concentration, chemical composition , and sources in the typical coal-dominated industrial city of Pingdingshan , China. Sci Total Environ 2016; 571: 1155-63.
33. Spindler G, Brüggemann E, Gnauk T et al. A four-year size-segregated characterization study of particles PM10, PM2.5and PM1 depending on air mass origin at Melpitz. Atmos Environ 2010; 44: 164-73.
34. Spindler G, Gruner A, Muller K et al. Long-term size-segregated particle (PM10, PM2.5, PM1) characterization study at Melpitz - influence of air mass inflow, weather conditions and season. J Atmos Chem 2013; 70: 165-95.
35. Srimuruganandam B, Shiva Nagendra SM. Source characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 mass using a chemical mass balance model at urban roadside. Sci Total Environ 2012a; 433: 8-19.
36. Srimuruganandam B, Shiva Nagendra, SM. Application of positive matrix factorization in characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 emission sources at urban roadside.Chemosphere 2012b; 88: 120-30.
37. Srimuruganandam B, Shiva Nagendra, SM. Characteristics of particulate matter and heterogeneous traffic in the urban area of India. Atmos Environ 2011a; 45: 3091-102.
38. Srimuruganandam B, Shiva Nagendra, SM. Chemical characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations emitted by heterogeneous traffic. Sci Total Environ 2011b; 409: 3144-57.
39. Srivastava A, Gupta S, Jain VK. Winter-time size distribution and source apportionment of total suspended particulate matter and associated metals in Delhi. Atmos Res 2009; 92: 88-99.
40. Temesi D, Molnár A, Mészáros E et al. Size resolved chemical mass balance of aerosol particles over rural Hungary. Atmos Environ 2001; 35: 4347-55.
41. Tiwari S, Bisht DS, Srivastava AK et al. Variability in atmospheric particulates and meteorological effects on their mass concentrations over Delhi, India. Atmos Res 2014: 145-146, 45-56.
42. Tiwari S, Srivastava AK, Bisht DS et al. Diurnal and seasonal variations of black carbon and PM2.5 over New Delhi, India: Influence of meteorology. Atmos Res 2013: 125-126, 50-62.
43. Wang C. Inhalability of ambient particles. In: Interface science and technology - volume 5 (1st Ed.), Inhaled particles. Elsevier, 2005a: 87-92.
44. Wang C. Fate of deposited particles. In: Interface science and technology - volume 5 (1st Ed.), Inhaled particles. Elsevier, 2005b: 149-158.
45. Wang H, Zhu B, Shen L et al. Water-soluble ions in atmospheric aerosols measured in five sites in the Yangtze River Delta, China: Size-fractionated, seasonal variations and sources. Atmos Environ 2015; 123: 370-9.
46. Williams RO, Carvalho TC, Peters JI. Influence of particle size on regional lung deposition - What evidence is there? Int J Pharm 2011; 406: 1-10.