Technology and the Environment – A Framework for a Symbiotic Relationship

Garry Blair; Rosane Pagano

Garry Blair Principal Lecturer, Operations, Technology, Events and Hospitality Management Business School, All Saints Campus, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0861-3429
Rosane Pagano Principal Lecturer, Operations, Technology, Events and Hospitality Management Business School, All Saints Campus, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Technology pervades every aspect of modern life and the recent pandemic has increased our reliance on and usage of technology to overcome the constraints of movement that have necessarily been imposed on populations. This has allowed society to proceed with business and social activity via the virtual world. Most of the major advances of society have been driven by technology to form new paradigms. However, these have brought their own problems, with the creation of pollution, waste, depletion of natural resources, exploitation
of the workforce, and destruction of the natural world. This paper aims to consider the requisite changes to use technology to sustain our environment, highlighting the attempts to reverse the destructive trends driven by technological advancement. The required contingency framework for technology is discussed, in respect of its central aspects.

The principal theme is that technology, in terms of the creation of tools for human usage, is neutral, however, the focus of society towards investing in technologies and the manner in which technologies are used is not neutral. The potential for political, social, and economic agenda exists, underpinning decisions in these spheres, so human interest drives this technological change. This article outlines the key themes leading to the development of a symbiotic approach to the relationship between technology and environment.

The requisite change drivers for technology projects are considered, such as the ‘triple bottom line’ approach that encompasses society and the environment together with profit as factors in decision-making and the use of global virtual teams, to run and maintain such projects and their resultant products and services.

The article uses a review of a range of literature to consider these central themes to enable and encourage technological change that sustains the environment, in respect of the natural and social worlds. A framework is proposed in order to provide an initial consideration of the topic and as a vehicle for future research into this area.

How to cite this article:
Blair G, Pagano R. Technology and the Environment – A Framework for a Symbiotic Relationship. J Adv Res Alt Energ Env Eco 2021; 8(2): 4-8.

References

1. Mishra AK. Sustainability and Risk Assessment of Salyankot Water Supply Project in Post-Earthquake
Scenario. International Journal of Operations Management and Information Technology 2018; 8(1): 1-30.
2. Lyytinen K, Newman M. Explaining Information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model.
European Journal of Information Systems 2008; 17(6): 589-613.
3. Duffield S, Whitty SJ. How to apply the Systemic Lessons Learned Knowledge model to wire an organisation for
the capability of storytelling. International Journal of Project Management 2016; 34: 429-443.
4. Whyte J, Stasis A, Lindkvist C. Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: Configuration management, asset information and ‘big data’. International Journal of Project Management 2016; 34: 339-351.
5. Tsatsou P, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Liebenau J. Towards a taxonomy for regulatory issues in a digital business
ecosystem in the EU. Journal of Information Technology 2010; 25: 288-307.
6. Aryal R, Paudel S, Mishra AK. Impact of Covid-19 on Budget Implementation at Gaindakot Municipality,
Nepal. International Journal of Computational Research and Development 2020; 5(2): 1-7.
7. Jacobides MG. In the ecosystem economy, what’s your strategy? Harvard Business Review 2019; 97(5): 128-137.
8. Esty DC, Charnovitz S. Green Rules to Drive Innovation. Harvard Business Review 2012; 90(3): 120-123.
9. Aarseth W, Ahola T, Aaltonen K et al. Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management 2017; 35: 1071-1083.
10. Wilson K, Doz YL. 10 Rules for Managing Global Innovation. Harvard Business Review 2012; 90(10): 84-90.
11. Bhattacherjee A, Park S. Why end-users move to the cloud: A migration-theoretic analysis. European Journal
of Information Systems 2014; 23(3): 1-16.
12. Surendra NC, Nazir S. Creating “informating” systems using Agile development practices: an action research
study. European Journal of Information Systems 2019; 28(5): 549-565.
13. Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing. 1997.
14. Battilana J, Pache A, Sengul M et al. The Dual-Purpose Playbook. Harvard Business Review 2019; 97(2): 124-
133.
15. Mishra AK, Aithal PS. Foreign Aid Movements in Nepal. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences 2021; 6(1): 142-161.
16. Collins Dictionary. Collins Online Dictionary 2021. Collins [Online] [Accessed on 1st April 2021].
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/