Challenges for Early Career Researchers in Academic Research
Abstract
The academic community’s early career researchers (ECRs) are a distinct and significant group that can spark systemic change in research culture and practice. Yet, because of institutional limitations as well as individual and professional restrictions, they do, in certain ways, occupy a niche that is deliberately inferior. These could put children at risk for abuse and lead to tension and worry. More credit fairness is required in research and publishing since ECRs’ efforts could unjustly enhance the reputations of their mentors and/ or supervisors. This is due to the possibility that they will come across a strict publication and research environment where the status quo is established fundamentally. Supervisors play a crucial role in assisting ECRs in navigating the unpredictable academic environment and helping them adjust to it. Additionally, ECRs must be aware of the rapidly changing nature of research and publishing, the value of reproducibility and open science, and the dangers of predatory publishing and spam. ECRs will benefit greatly from having an emphasis on research and publishing integrity, as well as flexibility, sensitivity, inventiveness, adaptability, courage, and strong observational abilities.
This opinion piece offers a comprehensive understanding of the challenges that ECRs have when conducting research and publishing. Additionally, this paper looks for unrelated elements that could increase the professional vulnerability of ECRs. It could be challenging for ECRs to carve out a distinctive career path that values creativity and fulfils their aspirations, whether personal or professional.
References
early career researchers to improve research culture and practice. PLoS Biol. 2022 Jul 7;20(7):e3001680.
2. Roscoe J. The key to a great society career support service? Get early career researchers on board quickly [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/
network/publishing/societies/member-engagement/ the-key-to-a-great-society-career-support-service-getearly- career-researchers-on-board-quickly.
3. Ajzen I, Sheikh S. Action versus inaction: anticipated affect in the theory of planned behavior. J Appl So Psychol. 2013 Jan;43(1):155-62.
4. Motschnig R, Ryback D. Transforming communication in leadership and teamwork person-centered innovations. Springer; 2016. p. 12-8.
5. Hardway CL, Stroud M. Using student choice to increase students’ knowledge of research methodology, improve their attitudes toward research, and promote acquisition of professional skills. Int J Teach Learn High
Educ. 2014;26(3):381-92.
6. Jandhyala B, Tilak G, Jalote P. Problems encountered by researchers building research universities in India. New Delhi: Sage; 2021. 415 p.
7. Myers KR, Tham WY, Yin Y, Cohodes N, Thursby JG, Thursby MC, et al. Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):880-3.
8. Bernard MA, Lauer M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the extramural scientific workforce – outcomes from an NIH-led survey [Internet]. National Institutes of Health, Extramural Nexus; 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 5]. Available from: https://nexus.od.nih.gov/ all/2021/03/25/the-impact-of-the-covid-19-pandemicon- the-extramural-scientific-workforce-outcomesfrom- an-nih-led-survey/
9. Rockey S. What are the chances of getting funded? [Internet]. National Institutes of Health, Extramural
Nexus; 2015 [cited 2023 Aug 5]. Available from: https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2015/06/29/what-arethe- chances-of-getting-funded/
10. Lowe-Power TM, Dyson L, Polter AM. A generation of junior faculty is at risk from the impacts of COVID-19. PLoS Biol. 2021 May 25;19(5):e3001266.
11. Langin K. In a first, U.S. private sector employs nearly as many Ph.D.s as schools do [Internet]. Science; 2019 [cited 2023 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www. science.org/content/article/first-us-private-sectoremploys- nearly-many-phds-schools-do-science-careers
12. Begley CG, Ioannidis JP. Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ Res. 2015 Jan 2;116(1):116-26.
13. Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham MH, Barbour V, et al. The Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers: fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737.
14. Evans TM, Bira L, Gastelum JB, Weiss LT, Vanderford NL. Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Mar;36(3):282-4.
15. McDowell GS, Gunsalus KT, MacKellar DC, Mazzilli SA, Pai VP, Goodwin PR, et al. Shaping the future of research: a perspective from junior scientists. F1000Res. 2014;3:291.
16. Taffe MA, Gilpin NW. Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health. Elife. 2021;10:e65697.
17. Ioannidis JP. Meta-research: why research on research matters. PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 13;16(3):e2005468.