Enhancing Language Proficiency Through Teaching Pragmatics

  • Sneha Pandey Student, Subhash Chandra Mahavidyalaya Chakarama, Varanasi.

Abstract

This comprehensive review examines the pivotal role of teaching pragmatics in language education and its profound impact on language proficiency. Pragmatics, as a branch of linguistics, scrutinizes the intricacies of language use in social contexts, encompassing the study of communication and the myriad sociocultural factors influencing linguistic choices. The article delves into the theoretical foundations of pragmatics, exploring Grice’s Maxims, Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory, and Speech Act Theory. Additionally, it addresses the challenges inherent in pragmatic competence, such as cross-cultural differences and the dynamic nature of language use, proposing effective pedagogical strategies to navigate these complexities.
The review emphasizes the necessity of integrating pragmatic instruction into language teaching, advocating for a paradigm shift towards innovative approaches. Task-based language teaching, role-playing activities, and real-world simulations are explored as dynamic methodologies that afford learners authentic opportunities to apply pragmatic knowledge. The article also discusses the role of technology-enhanced learning tools in facilitating pragmatic development, aligning language education with contemporary advancements.
As assessment is integral to the pedagogical process, the review scrutinizes various methods for evaluating pragmatic competence, ranging from discourse completion tasks to video-based assessments. It underscores the importance of formative assessment strategies that offer ongoing feedback, ensuring a nuanced understanding of learners’ pragmatic abilities.

References

1. Brown P, Levinson SC. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press; 1987.
2. Grice HP. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL, eds. Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. Academic
Press; 1975:41-58.
3. Thomas J. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Routledge; 1995.
4. Rose K. On the Validity of Discourse Completion Tests in Non-Western Contexts. Applied Linguistics. 2000;21(4):515-545.
5. Bardovi-Harlig K, Bastos MT. Explicitness, Oral Production, and the Acquisition of the Spanish Future. Hispania. 2011;94(3):457-474.
6. Taguchi N. Context, Individual Differences, and Pragmatic Competence. Channel View Publications; 2016.
7. Kasper G, Rose K. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. John Benjamins Publishing; 2002.
8. Barron A. Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2003.
9. Cohen AD. Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Pearson Education Limited; 1998.
10. Holmes J. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge; 2013.
11. Shively RL. Integrating Pragmatics into the Second Language Classroom: An In-Depth Guide. University of Michigan Press; 2018.
12. Celce-Murcia M, Olshtain E. Discourse and Context in Language Teaching: A Guide for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
13. Taguchi N. Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning. 2006;56(2):269-318.
14. Olshtain E, Cohen AD. Apology: A Speech Act Set in Its Pragmatic and Sociocultural Context. In: Blum-Kulka
S, House J, Kasper G, eds. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Ablex Publishing Corporation;
1989:155-173.
15. Rose K, Kasper G. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language: Studies in Honor of Ellen Contini-Morava. John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2001.
Published
2023-09-30
How to Cite
PANDEY, Sneha. Enhancing Language Proficiency Through Teaching Pragmatics. Journal of Advanced Research in English & Education, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 22-26, sep. 2023. ISSN 2456-4370. Available at: <http://thejournalshouse.com/index.php/Journal-English-Education/article/view/1017>. Date accessed: 02 jan. 2025.