The Influence of Gendered Access/ Control of Land and Dairy Products on Household Welfare in Murang’a County, Kenya
Abstract
Studies have revealed that there is existing gender inequality in access and control of resources, benefits and opportunities in the society including agricultural resources and benefits. This informed the concern of this study which sought to investigate the influence of the gendered access and control of land and dairy products on household welfare. The study was done in Murang’a County-Kenya. The study was guided by the Marxist feminism theory advanced by Friedrich Engels. It adopted a cross-sectional research design. A purposive sampling technique was used to select Kigumo out of the seven Sub-counties in Murang’a County as the study area. Further, a simple random sampling technique was used to select a total of four hundred and forty-two (442) male and female headed households practicing dairy farming in the Sub-county as the respondents of the study. The community leaders and key county officers were also included as key informants. To collect the data, the study used interview schedules for the selected household heads, guided questionnaires for the key informants and an observation checklist. Qualitative data was analyzed on the basis of themes derived from the study objective while quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS. The household welfare was gauged on the basis of the parameters drawn from the Constitution of Kenya (2010) Article 43 on social and economic rights namely health, housing, food, water and education. The study established that gendered access and control of land and dairy products has a major influence on the provision of household welfare.
How to cite this article:
Mwangi JW, Kimani EN, Masiga CO. The Influence of Gendered Access/ Control of Land and Dairy Products on Household Welfare in Murang’a County, Kenya. J Adv Res Humani Social Sci 2020; 7(2): 20-26.
References
2. Fafchamps M, Kebede B, Quisumbing AR. Intrahousehold Welfare in Rural Ethiopia. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2009; 71: 567–599. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00553. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468- 0084.2009.00553.x/abstract
3. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Gender equality and food security: Women’s Empowerment as a Tool against Hunger, Asian Development Bank, Philippines. 2013.
4. Hallman K. Mother-Father Resources, Marriage Payments, and Girl-Boy Health in Rural Bangladesh. In Agnes R. Quisumbing (ed.), Household Decisions, Gender and Development: A Synthesis of Recent Research. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Chapter 2003; 17: 115-120. Available at: http:// ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/16422/1/fc000093. pdf
5. Kabeer N. Women’s empowerment, development interventions and the management of information flows. IDS Bulletin 2010; 41(6): 105–113.
6. Kenya Human Rights Commission. Double standards: Women’s property rights violation in Kenya. Nairobi: KHRC; 2003.
7. Kimani E. Perception of youth on women’s rights to ownership and control of matrimonial property. American Journal of Arts and Humanities 2016; 1: A12-A24. Retrieved from http://www.asraresearch. org/ajah-vol-1-no-1 2016/
8. Lwelamira J, Binamungu HK, Njau FB. Contribution of small scale dairy farming under zero-grazing in improving household welfare in Kayanga ward, Karagwe District, Tanzania. Institute of rural development planning. 2010.
9. Muia JMK, Kariuki JN, Mbugua PN et al. Smallholder dairy production in high altitude Nyandarua milkshed in Kenya: Status, challenges and opportunities. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2011; 23. from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/5/muia23108.htm
10. Mwankemwa AS. Performance of saving and credit cooperative societies and their impact on rural livelihoods: A case study of Morogoro rural and Mvomero districts, Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. 2004.
11. Quisumbing A. Household decisions, gender, and development. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. 2003. Available at: http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/ id/126037.
12. Quisumbing AR, Maluccio JA. Resources at Marriage and Intra-Household Allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2003; 65: 283 327. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00052. Available at: http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0084.t01- 1 00052/abstract
13. Valdivia C, Gilles J. Gender and resource management: Households, group, strategies and transitions. A Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2001.