Stylistic Analysis of a Poem: An Inquiry into William Blake’s ‘The Lamb’
Abstract
Linguistic stylistics systematically analyses the language of a text, it objectively accounts for the meaning of a text. However, this objective scrutiny of a text is often criticised by many literary critics. They find stylistic analysis of a text is too mechanistic and cerebral in operations and instead of helping readers appreciate the text, it actually impedes the whole process of reading and appreciating literature. According to Gower (1986), “when a text is put under a microscope and readers’ attention is drawn to the analytical procedures, aesthetic qualities of the text are diminished and the readers who work under such laboratory conditions fail to appreciate the emotional appeal of the text.” Carter et al (1989) have very convincingly pointed out how a literary stylistic approach enhances the literary experience of the readers. Linguistic stylistics provides the readers with necessary tools and techniques to understand the aesthetic qualities of the text and also sensitise them to the intricacies of literature which may help them in interpreting the text in a better way. The aim of this paper is to explore different perspective to analyze a poem and what are the techniques and tools that the reader should keep in mind while reading or interpreting a poem? The author looks into perspectives of Stylistics and analyzes William Blake’s ‘The Lamb’which appeared in ‘Songs of Innocence’ (1789).
How to cite this article: Ray HM, Stylistic Analysis of a Poem: An Inquiry into William Blake’s The Lamb. J. Adv. Res. Humani. Social Sci. 2017; 4(1): 1-7.
References
2. Crystal D, Davy D. Investigating English Style. Longman: London 1969.
3. Eagleton T. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishers Limited. Britain 1996.
4. Enkvist EN.Linguistic Stylistics. Mouton. of Janua Linguarum: Series Critica 5 1973.
5. Evans, Robert C. Literary Contexts In Poetry: William Blake’s ‘The Tyger’.” Literary Contexts In Poetry: William Blake’s ‘Tyger’ 2006: 1: 2014. Literary Reference Center. Web. 12 May 2014.
6. Fish S. ‘What is stylistics and why are they saying such terrible things about it?’, In (ed.) (1981) Essays in Modern Stylistics London: Methuen 53–78 1981.
7. Heaney Seamus. The Redress of Poetry. Farrar, Straus & Giroux. American edition 1995.
8. Hudson, William Henry. An Introduction to Study of Literature. Quality Publishing Company. New Delhi 2005.
9. Gargesh R. Linguistics Perspective to Literary Style. Delhi:University of Delhi 1990.
10. Gautam, Rama and Niazi, Nozar. How to Study Literature: Stylistic and Pragmatic 2015. Approaches. PHI Learning Private Limited. Delhi.
11. Gower R. Can Stylistic Analysis Help the EFL Learner to Read Literature? ELT Journal. Oxford. 1986; 40: 2.
12. Jakobson R. Closing statement: linguistics and poetics In (ed) Style in Language, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1960; 350–77.
13. Leech GN. Language in Literature: Style and Foregrounding. Pearson Education: London 2008.
14. McIntyre, Dan and Jeffries, Lesley. Stylistics Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 2010.
15. Mills, S. Feminist Stylistics London: Routledge 1995.
16. Misra, Partha Sarathi. An Introduction to Stylistics: Theory and Practice. Orient Blackswan. Kolkata 2015.
17. Paul Simpson. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge, London and New York. Verdonk, Peter. Stylistics. Oxford University Press. Oxford/New York 2002.
18. Wales K. A Dictionary of Stylistics 2nd edition. Harlow: Longman 2001.
19. Widdowson HG. 2001 Stylistics and the Teaching of Literature Harlow: Longman 1975.