Navigating the Landscape of Knowledge Organization: Current Trends and Future Perspectives

Kapila Singh

Kapila Singh

Abstract

As the digital age continues to redefine the boundaries of information, the field of Knowledge Organization (KO) has emerged as a critical discipline for managing, navigating, and extracting value from vast knowledge repositories. This review article offers an in-depth exploration of the current trends and future prospects within the dynamic realm of Knowledge Organization. Tracing the historical evolution from traditional libraries to the Semantic Web, the article illuminates key advancements such as the integration of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, user-centric approaches, and the challenges associated with ambiguity, multilinguality, and cultural context. The review concludes by envisioning the future of Knowledge Organization, anticipating trends such as augmented reality integration and interdisciplinary approaches. By encapsulating the past, present, and potential future of KO, this article serves as a roadmap for scholars, practitioners, and enthusiasts navigating the ever-evolving landscape of organized knowledge.

References

1. Dahlberg I, Cleal B. Knowledge organization in the 21st century: Between historical patterns and future prospects. J Inf Sci. 2018;44(3):294-308.
2. Svenonius E. The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. The MIT Press; 2000.
3. Tennis JT. Knowledge organization systems: Managing intellectual access to information. Knowledge Organ.
2013;40(6):407-421.
4. Mai JE. The Classification and Organization of Knowledge: A History and Critical Analysis. Libraries Unlimited; 2016.
5. Ranganathan SR. Prolegomena to Library Classification. Asia Publishing House; 1967.
6. Gilchrist A. Information Architecture: For the Web and Beyond. O’Reilly Media; 2016.
7. Smiraglia RP. The Nature of “a work” in bibliographic and ontological perspective. J Doc. 2015;71(1):2-17.
8. Hjørland B. Theories of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organ. 2017;44(3):171-200.
9. Mai JE, Marchionini G. Exploratory search: A study of the informational needs of interdisciplinary scholars. Inf Process Manag. 2005;41(6):1359-1403.
10. Zeng ML, Chan LM. Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2004;55(5):377-395.
11. Soergel D, Lauser B. Ontology and thesaurus design for knowledge organization. J Digit Inf. 2007;8(2).
12. Mazzocchi F. Knowledge organization and the role of ontologies in biomedicine. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol.
2015;66(4):618-636.