The Citation Impact of Open Access LIS Journals: A Study of Selected Journals
Abstract
Introduction- In recent years, there has been considerable research on the citation impact of open access (OA) journals, with a focus on citation analysis. Citation analysis involves examining references made in one text to another, providing insights into subject relationships, author effectiveness, and publishing trends.
Purpose- The purpose of this study, is to find out the citation impact of open access in the field of library and information science during the period of 2017 to 2023.
Methodology- In this study, we analyze the frequency of cited articles and journals based on their open access status using two key indicators: output indicators and citation impact indicators.
Result- In this study, we examined two journals and compared both of them by their citation numbers and percentages.
Conclusion- To successfully support open access (OA) publications, a multifaceted approach is essential. This includes educating people about the benefits of OA, such as increased research impact, visibility, and the broader societal advantages of knowledge sharing. Engaging with academic communities through institutional channels, conferences, and social media can help cultivate a culture that values OA publishing.
References
2. Bessemer H [Internet]. Gathering evidence about the effectiveness of ‘open access’ publishing policies in agriculture; [cited 2007 Apr 19]. Available from: http://agriscontent.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/gathering-evidence-about-the-effectiveness-of-percentE2percent80percent9CopenaccesspercentE2percent80percent9D-publishing-policies-in-agriculture/
3. Björk BC. The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: a failed experiment? J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2012 Aug;63(8):1496-504.
4. Bornmann, L. (2013). How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top‐cited papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(3), 587-595.
5. Budapest Open Access Initiative. Make research publically available [Internet]. The Open Society Foundations; [cited Opensoc2024 Apr 4]. Available from: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/openaccess
6. Brody T. Citation analysis in the open access world [Internet]. Interactive Media International; 2004 [cited 2007 May 20]. Available from: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10000/01/tim_oa.pdf
7. Brody, T., Stamerjohanns, H., Vallières, F., Harnad, S., Yves, G., & Charles, O. (2004). The effect of open access on citation impact.
8. Coleman A, Roback J. Open access federation for library and information science [Internet]. D-LIB Magazine. 2005 [cited 2007 May 29];11(12):1-16. Available from: www.dlib.org/dlib/december05/coleman/12coleman.html
9. DePaul Library [Internet]. Guides; [cited 2007 May 23]. Available from: https://libguides.depaul.edu/
10. Laakso M, Björk BC. Delayed open access: an overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2013 Jun;64(7):1323–29.
11. Lee K, Brownstein JS, Mills RG, Kohane IS. Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration? PLoS One. 2010 Dec 15; 5(12):e14279.
12. McVeigh ME. Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns: a citation study from Thomson Scientific [Internet]. Philladelphia: Thompson Scientific; 2004 Oct [cited 2004 May 25]. p. 1-25. Available from: http://scientific.thomson.com/media/presentrep/essayspdf/openaccesscitations2.pdf
13. Wikipedia [Internet]. Open-access-journal; [cited 2004 May 22]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-access-journal
14. Publishing Open-Access Journals. A brief overview from the Public Library of Science. San Francisco: Public Library of Science; 2004.
15. Wikipedia [Internet]. Open access; 2023 Jul 11 [cited 2007 May 24]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access
16. Library and Information Association of South Africa [Internet]. About; [cited 2007 May 26]. Available from: https://www.liasa.org.za/page/about
17. RBU Journal of Library and Information Science [Internet]. About the journal; 2019 [cited 2021 May 25]. Available from: https://lisrbu.wixsite.com/dlis/rbu-journal-of-lis
18. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., ... & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375.
19. Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC medicine, 10, 1-10.
20. Claxton, L. D. (2005). Scientific authorship: Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, 589(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2005.01.003
21. Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., Blackmore, H., & Kitas, G. D. (2013). Writing a narrative biomedical review: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatology International, 31(11), 1409-1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3
22. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485-1495. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22673