Information science, social networking and libraries, e-library, digital library systems, digital library services and applications, digital library development and management, digital library standards and policy, digital library open sources, digital preservation, faculty/librarian partnerships or collaborations, cutting edge instruction and reference techniques, copyright issues in digital environment, remote access, collection development strategies, intellectual property rights, document delivery, e-resources, information and communication technology, information retrieval, information seeking behaviour, information literacy, knowledge organization, knowledge management, Web 2.0., indexing, and information retrieval systems aimed at enhancing the organization and accessibility of information resources, Digital Libraries, Archives, digital preservation, curation, management of digital collections, digital library technologies, literacy skills, including information-seeking behavior, critical evaluation, information sources, machine learning, blockchain, Open Access and Scholarly Communication: open access publishing models, open educational resources, evolving landscape, Information Ethics and Intellectual Freedom, access, privacy, intellectual freedom, responsible use of information, information behavior, user experience in libraries, design of user-centered information services.
Devaraj .
University Librarian & Co-PI of e-Granth Project, UAS, Library, GKVK.
Keywords:
Information Literacy, Authorship Pattern, Degree of Collaboration, AAPP, APPA
Abstract
Scientometric techniques were applied to analyse the authorship pattern and collaborative trend in the field of information literacy for period 1981 to 2015. A total of 5682 papers were examined by year wise to ascertain authorship patterns, degree of collaboration and author productivity. 34.40% of papers were published with three authors and 18.76% of papers were with six authors. In the degree of collaboration of all years i.e. from 1981 to 2015 is 0.98 mean value is 0.5.
References
1. Chadwick HM, Chadwick NK.(1986). Growth ofliterature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1932).
2. Gupta BM, Sharma P, Karisiddappa CR. Growth of research literature in scientific specialties: A modeling perspective. Scientometrics 1977; 40(3): 507-528.
3. Information literacy competency standards for higher education.(2000). [Brochure]. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries.
4. Karisiddappa CR, Maheswarappa BS, Shirol MV. Authorship pattern and collaborative research in psychology. IASLIC Bulletin 1990; 35(2):73-78.
5. Pradhan, Pallab; Panda, Saroj; Chandrakar, Rajesh. (2011). Authorship pattern and degree of collaboration in Indian chemistry literature.Proceedings of the 8th International CALIBER -2011, Goa University, Goa, March 02-04, 2011: 691-699.
6. Sangam SL. Scientometrics: Quantitative methods for Library and Information Science. Bangalore: content craft. 2015.