Control over Public Policy and Administration: An Overview
Abstract
This review article explores the complex world of control mechanisms
used to influence governance and public policy. It looks at the various
facets of accountability, transparency, participatory democracy in
relation to the management of public affairs. This study provides a
thorough review of the many control mechanisms, their significance,
problems, the evolving landscape in the context of modern society
by synthesising existing literature, case studies, new trends. The
examination takes into account historical viewpoints, cultural influences,
regional and international variances in control methods. The article’s
conclusion emphasises the significance of maintaining transparency
and participation practises while achieving a delicate balance between
centralised control and decentralised decision-making. The synthesis of
diverse insights underscores the intricate tapestry of control in public
administration and policy, offering insights for scholars, practitioners,
policymakers to navigate the complexities of effective and accountable
governance.
References
uncertain democracies. Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2-3), 93-109.
3. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
4. Bovens, M., ‘t Hart, P., & Peters, B. G. (2001). Different shades of grey: Monitoring bureaucracies and the new
public management. Public Administration, 79(1), 3-17.
5. Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in
Practice, 17(4-5), 663-671.
6. Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability: An ever-expanding concept?. Public Administration, 78(3), 555-573.
7. Pateman, C. (2012). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.
8. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory
governance. Politics & Society, 31(1), 73-103.
9. Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Allegretti, G. (2012). Participatory budgeting worldwide: An initial empirical
assessment. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 506-527.
10. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, democracy: The human development
sequence. Cambridge University Press.
11. Lee, C. M., & Taplin, R. (2017). Big data analytics, digital government, the politics of scale. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 826-836.
12. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, the Internet worldwide.
Cambridge University Press.
13. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University
Press.
14. Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2010). So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen
engagement. IDS Working Papers, 2010(347), 1-64.
15. Schedler, A., Diamond, L., & Plattner, M. F. (Eds.). (1999). The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in
new democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
16. Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,
16(4), 185-205.
17. Beetham, D. (1999). Democracy and human rights. John Wiley & Sons.
18. Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton University Press.
19. Grindle, M. S. (2007). Going local: Decentralization, democratization, the promise of good governance.
Princeton University Press.
20. Warren, M. E. (2008). Citizen participation and democratic deficits: Considerations from the perspective of democratic theory. In Comparative Political Studies (Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 211-234). Sage
Publications
