Advances in Electroactive Polymers: From Fundamentals to Applications

Shilpi Yadav

Shilpi Yadav Department of Physics, Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU), belgaum.

Abstract

Electroactive polymers (EAPs) have emerged as a fascinating and versatile class of materials with the ability to change shape, size, or properties in response to electrical stimulation. This review article provides a comprehensive exploration of recent advances in the field of EAPs, encompassing their fundamental principles, synthesis techniques, characterization methods, and a wide array of applications across diverse industries. We delve into the underlying mechanisms governing the electroactivity of polymers and showcase how these materials have paved the way for innovations in robotics, sensors, actuators, artificial muscles, energy harvesting, and more.

In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding the intricacies of EAPs, unlocking their potential in various domains. We highlight the pivotal role of EAPs in addressing complex challenges across industries, ranging from healthcare and aerospace to renewable energy and beyond.

Furthermore, this review places a strong emphasis on the mechanisms underpinning the electroactivity of polymers, shedding light on the science behind their remarkable properties. We explore the synthesis and characterization techniques that have enabled the fabrication and assessment of EAPs, as well as the diverse applications that have arisen from their unique capabilities.

References

1. Bar-Cohen, Y. (2001). Electroactive polymers as artificial muscles: Capabilities, potentials, and challenges. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, 4326, 40-54.
2. Carpi, F., & De Rossi, D. (2004). Electroactive polymer-based devices for e-textiles in biomedicine. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2, 1742-1747.
3. Pelrine, R., Kornbluh, R., Pei, Q., & Joseph, J. (2000). High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100%. Science, 287(5454), 836-839.
4. Shahinpoor, M., Kim, K. J., & Mojarrad, M. (2000). Ionic polymer-metal composites: III. mechanical and environmental properties. Smart Materials and Structures, 9(5), 647-653.
5. Smela, E. (2003). Conjugated polymer actuators for biomedical applications. Advanced Materials, 15(6), 481 494.
6. Madden, J. D. (2002). Electrostrictive polymers as sensors and actuators. MRS Bulletin, 27(10), 766-772.
7. Kim, S., Laschi, C., & Trimmer, B. (2013). Soft robotics: A bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends in Biotechnology, 31(5), 287-294.
8. Anderson, I. A., & Saha, B. (2019). Ionic polymer-metal composites (IPMCs) as biomimetic sensors, actuators, and artificial muscles—A review. Smart Materials and Structures, 28(5), 053002.
9. Asaka, K., Yamaura, H., Ushiki, T., & Uchida, H. (2011). A review on ionic polymer-metal composites. Polymers,3(1)-320.
10. Haines, C. S., Lima, M. D., Li, N., & Spinks, G. M. (2016). Artificial muscles from fishing line and sewing thread.
Science, 343(6173), 868-872.
11. Bar-Cohen, Y. (Ed.). (2004). Electroactive polymer (EAP) actuators as artificial muscles: Reality, potential, and
challenges (Vol. 5385). SPIE Press.
12. Kaczmarek, K. A., Tyler, M., & Birch, G. E. (2014). An electroactive polymer-based system for rehabilitation of the upper
extremity in stroke patients. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 22(2), 333-344.