‘Serving the Public in the Post Pandemic World’: A Study of Project Management in the Public Sector

  • Garry Blair Assessor, INPD, Blackthorn House, Appley Bridge, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Stuart Barratt Associate Lecturer, Operations, Technology, Events and Hospitality Management, Business School, All Saints Campus, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Rosane Pagano Principal Lecturer, Operations, Technology, Events and Hospitality Management, Business School, All Saints Campus, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Abstract

The public sector has been severely affected by the pandemic, resulting in major changes to operating conditions and expectations. The requirements for public sector projects have similarly changed, with the nature and scope of such enterprises being severely affected. The pandemic has led to excessive public expenditure on health matters and supporting the economy through the restrictions to activities. This paper proposes that there has been a major change to project management in the public sector. Priorities have altered and the available resources have been drastically reduced. Current projects have been cancelled or reduced in scope and new projects have been commissioned for different priorities, shaped by the pandemic. The approach to project management has also been amended, due to the effects of the pandemic. This has led to generally higher levels of urgency, reduced budgets and shorter timescales for implementation.
Public sector projects are vital to the global economy, in terms of delivering services and stimulating private sector demand. Public sector projects are, therefore, of vital importance and require further study to help to understand the prevailing operating conditions and demand. Research can also assist in comprehending the actions required of the project manager, in directing such enterprises.
This paper examines key literatures, discerning the major themes in this sphere. A model of learning is adapted to categorise these themes. An interview has been held with a senior manager from a UK public sector organisation, with a job remit spanning health, education and social services, and the main themes are also selected from the interview text. This enables the academic and practitioner perspectives to be considered.
A summary of implications for practice is presented, comprising a ‘rich picture’ of key areas to be addressed in respect of public sector projects, utilising the soft systems methodology techniques.


How to cite this article: Blair G, Barratt S, Pagano R. ‘Serving the Public in the Post Pandemic World’: A Study of Project Management in the Public Sector. J Adv Res Alt Energ Env Eco 2022; 9(1&2): 11-18.

References

1. Needle D. Business in Context: an Introduction to Business and its Environment (6/e), Cengage Learning EMEA. 2015.
2. Blair G, Pagano R. A Guide for Researchers to Negotiate the Research Process. Journal of Innovative Research in Education & Management 2021; 4(3): 1-5.
3. McClory S et al. Conceptualising the lessons-learned process in project management: Towards a triple-loop learning framework. International Journal of Project Management 2017; 35: 1322-1335
4. Checkland P, Scholes J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: Wiley. 1990.
5. Blair G, Pagano R, Burns B. Contingency Framework for Addressing Failure in Information Systems. Journal of Innovative Research in IT & Computer Science 2019; 3(2): 1-4.
6. Voegtlin C, Scherer AG, Stahl GK et al. Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation. Journal of Management Studies 2022; 59(1): 1-28.
7. Blair G, Pagano R. Technology and the Environment - a Framework for a Symbiotic Relationship. Journal of Advanced Research in Alternative Energy, Environment and Ecology 2021; 8(2): 4-8.
8. Davis GF. Corporate Purpose Needs Democracy. Journal of Management Studies 2021; 58(3) May: 902-913
9. Zhang S, Gao Y, Feng Z et al. PPP application in infrastructure development in China: Institutional analysis and implications. International Journal of Project Management 2015; 33: 497-509.
10. Chalmers D. Social Entrepreneurship’s Solutionism Problem. Journal of Management Studies 2021; 58(5): 1363-1370.
11. Winch GM, Cha J. Owner challenges on major projects: The case of UK government. International Journal of Project Management 2020; 38: 177-187.
12. Blair G, Barratt S, Pagano R. Strategic Choices for the Post Pandemic Playbook. The Journal of Innovative Research In Social Sciences & Humanities 2021; 4(3): 15-20.
13. Simard M, Aubry M, Laberge D. The utopia of order versus chaos: A conceptual framework for governance, organizational design and governmentality in projects. International Journal of Project Management 2018; 36: 460-473.
14. Blair G, Grant V, Woodcock H. Managing the Technology Life Cycle - a Contextual Approach to Analysis. Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering & Technology 2020; 4(1): 1-5.
15. White L, Lockett A, Currie G et al. Hybrid Context, Management Practices and Organizational Performance: A Configurational Approach. Journal of Management Studies 2021; 58(3): 718-748.
16. Battilana J, Pache A, Sengul M et al. The Dual-Purpose Playbook”, Harvard Business Review. 2019; 97(2): 124-133.
17. Kanter RM, Hayirli TC. Creating high-impact coalitions. Harvard Business Review. 2022; 1-12
18. Biersteker E, Koppenjan J, Van Marrewijk A. Translating the invisible: Governing underground utilities in the Amsterdam airport Schiphol terminal project. International Journal of Project Management 2021; 39: 581-593
19. Ruijter H, Van Marrewijk A, Veenswijk MB et al. ‘Filling the mattress’: Trust development in the governance of infrastructure megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management 2021; 39: 351-364.
20. Pollack J, Pollack R. Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organisational change program: Presentation and Practice. Systems Practice and Action Research 2015; 28: 51-66
21. Nieto-Rodriguez A. The Project Economy Has Arrived. Harvard Business Review. 2021: 1-13.
22. Blair G, Pagano R. Leadership and Context to Create the New Technological Society. Journal of Innovative Research in Education & Management 2020; 4(1): 6-9. Retrieved from http://ijirem.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ICEM-2020-Dr.-Garry.pdf
23. Blair G, Pagano R. Virtual cells for collaborative and experiential learning in distance education, LTSE 2021 Conference Proceedings. Virtual 2021: 23-26.
24. Floris M, Cuganesan S. Project leaders in transition: Manifestations of cognitive and emotional capacity. International Journal of Project Management 2019; 37: 517-532.
25. Zerjav V, McArthur J, Edkins A. The multiplicity of value in the front-end of projects: The case of London transportation infrastructure. International Journal of Project Management. 2021; 39: 507-519.
26. Nielson PA, Persson JS. Useful business cases: value creation in IS projects. European Journal of Information Systems 2017; 26: 66-83.
27. Samset K, Volden GH. Front-end definition of projects: Ten paradoxes and some reflections regarding project management and project governance. International Journal of Project Management 2015: 1-17.
28. Blair G, Woodcock H, Pagano R. Risk Management in the Post Pandemic Business Environment. Journal of Advanced Research in Alternative Energy, Environment and Ecology 2021; 8(3&4): 15-21.
Published
2022-08-25
How to Cite
BLAIR, Garry; BARRATT, Stuart; PAGANO, Rosane. ‘Serving the Public in the Post Pandemic World’: A Study of Project Management in the Public Sector. Journal of Advanced Research in Alternative Energy, Environment and Ecology, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1&2, p. 11-18, aug. 2022. ISSN 2455-3093. Available at: <https://thejournalshouse.com/index.php/AltEnergy-Ecology-EnvironmentJ/article/view/612>. Date accessed: 07 feb. 2023.