Family Dynamics Education (FDE) as a Preventive Intervention: Survey-Based Evidence for Curriculum Integration in the 21st Century Education System
Keywords:
Family Dynamics Education, Relationship Education, Mental Health Prevention, Curriculum Integration, Value-Based EducationAbstract
Contemporary education prioritizes academic and professional achievement but often neglects the foundational role of family relationships in psychological well-being. This study evaluates Family Dynamics Education (FDE) as a preventive intervention within school curricula to address rising family conflicts,
emotional distress, and the "ground reality" of modern familial crises.
Utilizing a reverse-engineered research design, the study analyzes survey data from 1,025 diverse respondents. The findings reveal an overwhelming consensus, robust family support is the most critical factor in preventing mental health challenges such as stress, depression, and suicidal tendencies. The research identifies a lack of open communication, declining interpersonal gratitude, increasing
individualism, and the disruptive influence of technology as the primary drivers of domestic conflict.
A significant majority of participants support the inclusion of mandatory relationship literacy in schools. The study argues that education systems must adopt a holistic, value-oriented approach to nurture emotional intelligence and relational competence. This intervention aligns directly with India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which mandates the development of social, ethical, and emotional capacities alongside academic growth.
Ultimately, integrating Family Dynamics Education (FDE) serves as a proactive strategy for mental health promotion and conflict reduction. By mitigating the stressors of globalization and individualism, FDE fosters sustainable social harmony and prepares students to navigate the complexities of modern human relationships with resilience and gratitude.
How to cite this article:
Thacker B, Pathak S, Chhanwal S, “Family Dynamics Education (FDE) as a Preventive Intervention: Survey-Based Evidence for Curriculum Integration in the 21st Century Education System”. Int J Adv Res Peace Harm Edu 2026; 11(1): 8-16.
Date of Submission: 2026-01-12
Date of Acceptance: 2026-04-02
DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.24321/2455.9326.202603
References
Dwivedi, R. C. (2020). Indian Philosophy and the Global
Relevance of VasudhaivaKutumbakam. New Delhi:
Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
Supreme Court: “We Believe In ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’
But Struggle To Stay United Even With Our Own
Families https://www.google.com/amp/s/timesofindia.
indiatimes.com/india/concept-of-family-eroding- country-
on-brink-of-one-person-one-family-laments-supreme-
court/amp_articleshow/119616220.cms
Chaudhary, N. (2019). Family, Self, and Society: A Psychological
Perspective on Indian Families. Springer.
Kakar, S., &Kakar, K. (2007). The Indians: Portrait of a
People. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development:
Experiments by nature and design. Harvard
University Press.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support,
and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin,
(2), 310–357.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development.
Oxford University Press.
Jadhav, B. R. (2022, September 16). Family worries
trigger 32% of suicides in India.
BusinessLine. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/
data-stories/data-focus/family-worries- trigger-32-
of-suicides-in-india/article65893964.ece [visited on
october]
Allen, T. D., Cho, E., & Meier, L. L. (2014). Work–
Family Boundary Dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational
Psychology and Organizational Behavior,
(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-
-091330
